In Short
S&S Co.'s Delhi NCR practice serves New Delhi-based clients in commercial litigation, arbitration and corporate matters, appearing before the Delhi High Court, NCLT/NCLAT and DRT/DRAT. Our team operates from our Sector-29, Noida head office, minutes from South and Central Delhi via the DND Flyway.
Serving New Delhi's Commercial & Corporate Sector
New Delhi is the seat of the Delhi High Court — one of India's most active commercial litigation and arbitration forums — and hosts the NCLT and NCLAT's principal benches, the DRT/DRAT, and a dense concentration of corporate headquarters across Connaught Place, Nehru Place, Bhikaji Cama Place and the Okhla industrial area.
S&S Co. represents New Delhi-based businesses and individuals in commercial suits, arbitration proceedings, insolvency matters and corporate advisory work, with our advocates appearing regularly before the Delhi High Court and its Commercial Division.
Nearby Courts & Tribunals
Delhi High Court
NCLT — New Delhi Bench
NCLAT — New Delhi (Principal Bench)
DRT / DRAT — Delhi
District Courts — Tis Hazari, Patiala House, Saket, Rohini
Competition Commission of India
Practice Areas Served in New Delhi
How We Serve New Delhi Clients
Our Sector-29, Noida head office is approximately 25 minutes from South Delhi via the DND Flyway, and well connected to Central and North Delhi via the Noida-Delhi corridor — allowing us to appear before the Delhi High Court, NCLT and DRT with the same responsiveness as a Delhi-based practice, while our clients benefit from our combined Delhi NCR and Kolkata coverage.
Illustrative Scenarios
The following are hypothetical, illustrative scenarios prepared for educational purposes. They are not descriptions of actual client matters, and no outcome is guaranteed in any specific case.
Illustrative Scenario
Corporate Headquartered in Connaught Place Facing an Operational Creditor's CIRP Petition
A New Delhi company disputes an operational creditor's claim that it says was always contested, and now faces a CIRP petition before NCLT. Establishing a genuine pre-existing dispute — documented before the demand notice — is the strongest defence to admission.
Illustrative Scenario
Nehru Place Business Pursuing a High-Value Commercial Suit
A Nehru Place-based electronics trading company needs to recover a substantial sum from a distributor under a written distribution agreement. Filing before the Delhi High Court's Commercial Division, with mandatory pre-institution mediation completed first, keeps the matter on the Commercial Courts Act's compressed timeline.
Illustrative Scenario
Multinational's Delhi Office Defending a Trademark Opposition
A multinational's India subsidiary, headquartered in Central Delhi, faces an opposition to its trademark application from a domestic competitor claiming prior use. A well-evidenced response demonstrating the multinational's own prior international use and reputation is central to defending the application.
Illustrative Scenario
Financial Institution Enforcing Security Over a Delhi NCR Borrower's Assets
A bank headquartered in Delhi needs to enforce a SARFAESI notice against a defaulting borrower's commercial property. Strict adherence to the Section 13(2)/13(4) notice and possession timeline protects the sale from a later borrower challenge.
Notable Legal Developments
Supreme Court — 2026 INSC 674Jul 9, 2026
M/s Levitate Mobile Technologies Pvt. Ltd. v. M/s Standard Chartered Bank & Anr.
Commercial Courts Act Is Meant for Expediency — Voluminous Evidence Cannot Dilute Its Rigours
The Supreme Court held that the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 exists to secure speedy disposal of high-value commercial disputes, and that a litigant cannot resist timely production of evidence merely by pleading that the record is voluminous. The Court read this squarely into the summary and case-management procedures the Act builds on top of the ordinary CPC.
Key Takeaway — Parties before the Commercial Courts of Delhi, Gautam Buddh Nagar and Kolkata must front-load disclosure and evidence — pleading volume as an excuse for delay will not be entertained.
Supreme CourtJul 2, 2026
Essel Infraprojects — NCLT Order Set Aside for Reliance on AI-Hallucinated Precedents
Supreme Court Sets Aside NCLT Insolvency Order Built on Fabricated, AI-Generated Case Law
The Supreme Court set aside an NCLT order in the Essel Infraprojects insolvency matter after discovering the tribunal's reasoning relied on non-existent precedents generated by an AI tool, and directed the Bar Council of India to frame norms governing the verification of AI-assisted legal research before it is placed before courts and tribunals.
Key Takeaway — Every citation used in NCLT/NCLAT filings — whether drafted with AI assistance or not — must be independently verified against primary sources before filing; unverified AI output is now a sanctionable and case-fatal risk.
See all Legal Updates →
Frequently Asked Questions
Does S&S Co. have a separate office in New Delhi?
Our Delhi NCR practice operates from our Sector-29, Noida head office, a short drive from South and Central Delhi, from where we appear regularly before the Delhi High Court, NCLT/NCLAT and DRT/DRAT.
Which court handles commercial disputes for New Delhi businesses?
The Delhi High Court's Commercial Division, and the Commercial Courts of Delhi, handle commercial disputes above the pecuniary threshold, with NCLT/NCLAT handling insolvency and company law matters.
Can S&S Co. represent clients in NCLT and NCLAT proceedings in New Delhi?
Yes — our IBC and insolvency practice appears regularly before both the NCLT New Delhi Bench and the NCLAT's Principal Bench in New Delhi.