S&S
S & S Co.
Advocates & Solicitors
Bar Council of India: Notice

Important Disclaimer & Notice

As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, advocates are not permitted to solicit work or advertise in any manner. By proceeding, you acknowledge that you are seeking information relating to S & S Co. of your own accord and that there has been no solicitation, advertisement or inducement by S & S Co. or any of its members.

The content of this website is provided solely for informational purposes and should not be construed as legal advice. S & S Co. shall not be liable for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on material provided herein.

Any information shared through this website does not create an attorney-client relationship. Transmission of information herein is not intended to constitute, nor does receipt thereof constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

The contents of this website are the intellectual property of S & S Co. No part constitutes legal advice. Readers are requested to seek formal legal counsel before acting upon any information contained herein.
About Practice Areas Locations Legal Updates Legal News Team Blog Search Contact Us
Corporate Law & M&A · 7 October 2026

NCLAT Upholds Supervised 'Swiss Challenge' Auction as Exit Remedy in Family Company Oppression Dispute

Source: Originally reported by IBC Laws and SNG & Partners on and around 18 September 2026. This article has been independently researched and rewritten in full by S&S Co. Advocates & Solicitors for informational purposes: it is not a reproduction of the original reports. Readers are encouraged to consult the original sources and the underlying order directly.

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi, has upheld an NCLT order directing two warring shareholder groups of a closely-held family company, Cheers Interactive (India) Pvt. Ltd., to bid for each other's shares through a supervised 'Swiss Challenge' auction, confirming this as a valid remedy for oppression under Sections 241-242 of the Companies Act, 2013.

The company was a quasi-partnership in substance, run on the mutual trust of two family shareholder groups. That trust had broken down irretrievably, and the NCLT found that one group had excluded the other from management and from the fruits of the company's profits without due process, amounting to oppression. Rather than ordering a winding up, the NCLT directed both groups to bid for each other's stake under the supervision of an independent observer, using the competitive 'Swiss Challenge' bidding method to fix a fair exit price.

On appeal by the shareholders excluded from management, the NCLAT upheld this approach, holding that Section 242(2)(b) of the Companies Act empowers the NCLT to direct a competitive inter se bidding process between deadlocked shareholder groups where both are willing and financially able to buy out the other, and that a supervised Swiss Challenge auction, with an independent observer overseeing the process, is a fair and transparent way to arrive at that exit price.

Newsletter

Fortnightly Legal Updates,
By Practice Area

A short digest of significant rulings, regulatory changes and practical guides across our practice areas, sent every two weeks. For general information only, not legal advice.

Get In Touch

Have a Question About
Corporate Law & M&A?

Tell us about your situation, and we'll help you figure out the right next step.

Contact S&S Co. →

A full-service law firm headquartered in Noida, Delhi and Kolkata, providing commercial litigation, arbitration, corporate advisory and regulatory counsel across Delhi NCR, Kolkata and pan-India.

Practice

Corporate Law & M&A All Practice Areas

Locations

Noida All Locations

Firm

Team Legal Updates Legal News Blog Newsletter Contact