S&S
S & S Co.
Advocates & Solicitors
Bar Council of India: Notice

Important Disclaimer & Notice

As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, advocates are not permitted to solicit work or advertise in any manner. By proceeding, you acknowledge that you are seeking information relating to S & S Co. of your own accord and that there has been no solicitation, advertisement or inducement by S & S Co. or any of its members.

The content of this website is provided solely for informational purposes and should not be construed as legal advice. S & S Co. shall not be liable for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on material provided herein.

Any information shared through this website does not create an attorney-client relationship. Transmission of information herein is not intended to constitute, nor does receipt thereof constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

The contents of this website are the intellectual property of S & S Co. No part constitutes legal advice. Readers are requested to seek formal legal counsel before acting upon any information contained herein.
About Practice Areas Locations Legal Updates Legal News Team Blog Search Contact Us
Intellectual Property · 25 August 2026

Delhi High Court Refers Online-Accessibility Jurisdiction Question in HUL's Disparagement Suit to a Larger Bench

Source: Originally reported by LiveLaw Biz, Mondaq and Business Standard in and around August 2026. This article has been independently researched and rewritten in full by S&S Co. Advocates & Solicitors for informational purposes: it is not a reproduction of the original reports. Readers are encouraged to consult the original sources and the underlying judgment directly.

Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani of the Delhi High Court has declined to decide, at the level of a single judge, whether the mere accessibility of online content within Delhi is enough to give Delhi courts territorial jurisdiction in an intellectual property or disparagement suit. By order dated 25 August 2026, he referred the question to a larger bench in Hindustan Unilever Limited v. Kwick Living (I) Private Limited.

Hindustan Unilever sued for a permanent injunction against an advertisement campaign titled "War on What's Hidden", which it said disparaged its Vim and Surf Excel products through unsubstantiated claims. Both companies are headquartered in Mumbai and the disputed hoarding was in Mumbai. HUL argued that Delhi courts had jurisdiction because it has a corporate office in Delhi and the campaign was also accessible in Delhi on YouTube, Instagram and Kwick Living's website.

Noting conflicting Supreme Court and Delhi High Court precedent on whether online accessibility within a forum, without more, can found territorial jurisdiction, the Court referred the question to a larger bench instead of resolving it itself.

Newsletter

Fortnightly Legal Updates,
By Practice Area

A short digest of significant rulings, regulatory changes and practical guides across our practice areas, sent every two weeks. For general information only, not legal advice.

Get In Touch

Have a Question About
Intellectual Property?

Tell us about your situation, and we'll help you figure out the right next step.

Contact S&S Co. →

A full-service law firm headquartered in Noida, Delhi and Kolkata, providing commercial litigation, arbitration, corporate advisory and regulatory counsel across Delhi NCR, Kolkata and pan-India.

Practice

Intellectual Property All Practice Areas

Locations

Noida All Locations

Firm

Team Legal Updates Legal News Blog Newsletter Contact