S&S
S & S Co.
Advocates & Solicitors
Bar Council of India: Notice

Important Disclaimer & Notice

As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, advocates are not permitted to solicit work or advertise in any manner. By proceeding, you acknowledge that you are seeking information relating to S & S Co. of your own accord and that there has been no solicitation, advertisement or inducement by S & S Co. or any of its members.

The content of this website is provided solely for informational purposes and should not be construed as legal advice. S & S Co. shall not be liable for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on material provided herein.

Any information shared through this website does not create an attorney-client relationship. Transmission of information herein is not intended to constitute, nor does receipt thereof constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

The contents of this website are the intellectual property of S & S Co. No part constitutes legal advice. Readers are requested to seek formal legal counsel before acting upon any information contained herein.
About Practice Areas Locations Legal Updates Legal News Team Blog Search Contact Us
Power, Energy & Mining · 14 April 2026

Delay in Filing a True-Up Petition Does Not by Itself Forfeit a Generator's Claim to Carrying Cost: APTEL

Source: As reported by Bar and Bench around 14 April 2026. This article has been independently researched and rewritten in full by S&S Co. Advocates & Solicitors for informational purposes; it is not a reproduction of the original report. Readers are encouraged to consult the original source and the underlying judgment or order directly.

The Appellate Tribunal for Electricity has held that a generating company's delay in filing a tariff true-up petition does not, by itself, extinguish its entitlement to carrying cost on capital expenditure that the regulator has otherwise found admissible. The ruling arose from an appeal by a thermal generator, referred to here as Meghdoot Thermal Power Ltd., against an order of the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission that had disallowed carrying cost on the ground that the true-up petition itself had been filed years after the relevant tariff period had closed.

The Tribunal distinguished between the timeliness of the petition and the substantive merits of the underlying claim, holding that a regulator cannot treat a procedural delay in filing as an automatic bar to a claim that is otherwise factually and legally sound, particularly where the delay itself was explained by circumstances outside the generator's control, such as pending audit reconciliation. At the same time, the Tribunal was careful to note that regulators retain the discretion to scrutinise a delayed claim more closely, and that a generator seeking condonation of delay must still place credible reasons for it on record rather than assume that mere disclosure at a later date is sufficient.

The order also reiterated that carrying cost, when allowed, should ordinarily run from the date the underlying expenditure was actually incurred, or from a date reasonably connected to it, rather than being pegged arbitrarily to the date of the true-up petition itself, since carrying cost is compensatory in nature and is meant to offset the time value of money the generator has been kept out of.

For generating companies that have deferred filing true-up petitions pending internal reconciliation or awaiting statutory auditor sign-off, the ruling provides some reassurance that a late filing will not automatically doom an otherwise valid claim, though it does not dilute the underlying obligation to file true-up petitions within a reasonable time of the relevant tariff period closing.

Newsletter

Fortnightly Legal Updates,
By Practice Area

A short digest of significant rulings, regulatory changes and practical guides across our practice areas, sent every two weeks. For general information only, not legal advice.

Get In Touch

Have a Question About
Power, Energy & Mining?

Tell us about your situation, and we'll help you figure out the right next step.

Contact S&S Co. →

A full-service law firm headquartered in Noida, Delhi and Kolkata, providing commercial litigation, arbitration, corporate advisory and regulatory counsel across Delhi NCR, Kolkata and pan-India.

Practice

Commercial Litigation Arbitration All 16 Practice Areas

Locations

Noida All Locations

Firm

Team Legal Updates Legal News Blog Newsletter Contact