S&S
S & S Co.
Advocates & Solicitors
Bar Council of India — Notice

Important Disclaimer & Notice

As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, advocates are not permitted to solicit work or advertise in any manner. By proceeding, you acknowledge that you are seeking information relating to S & S Co. of your own accord and that there has been no solicitation, advertisement or inducement by S & S Co. or any of its members.

The content of this website is provided solely for informational purposes and should not be construed as legal advice. S & S Co. shall not be liable for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on material provided herein.

Any information shared through this website does not create an attorney-client relationship. Transmission of information herein is not intended to constitute, nor does receipt thereof constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

The contents of this website are the intellectual property of S & S Co. No part constitutes legal advice. Readers are requested to seek formal legal counsel before acting upon any information contained herein.
About Practice Areas Locations Legal Updates Legal News Team Blog Contact Us
Intellectual Property · 6 July 2026

A Mark Need Not Be Formally 'Well-Known' First to Invoke Cross-Category Protection: Delhi High Court Cancels ZORA Registration Over ZARA

Source: Originally reported by SCC Online, BananaIP and Legal Service India on and around 6 July 2026, covering the Delhi High Court's ruling in Industria de Diseño Textil, S.A. v. Registrar of Trade Marks & Anr. (2026 SCC OnLine Del 5181; C.A. (COMM.IPD-TM) 52/2024). This article has been independently researched and rewritten in full by S&S Co. Advocates & Solicitors for informational purposes — it is not a reproduction of the original reports. Readers are encouraged to consult the original sources and the underlying judgment directly.

Inditex, owner of the ZARA mark, appealed the Trade Marks Registry's refusal to cancel a third party's registration of ZORA (Registration No. 4310686 in Class 24). Justice Jyoti Singh held that a mark need not first be formally declared 'well-known' under Section 11(6)-(9) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 before its owner can invoke the cross-category protection available under Section 11(2).

Applying the anti-dissection rule, the Court found ZORA phonetically and structurally similar enough to ZARA that its adoption was without due cause and would take unfair advantage of ZARA's distinctive character and repute. The Court ordered cancellation of the ZORA registration and directed the Registrar to remove it from the Register within two months.

Owners of globally recognised brands do not need a separate, formal 'well-known mark' declaration already in hand before invoking Section 11(2) to block a similar mark in an unrelated goods category — reputation and distinctiveness evidence placed before the court can suffice on its own.

Get In Touch

Have a Question About
Intellectual Property?

Tell us about your situation — we'll help you figure out the right next step.

Contact S&S Co. →

A full-service law firm headquartered in Noida, Delhi and Kolkata — commercial litigation, arbitration, corporate advisory and regulatory counsel across Delhi NCR, Kolkata and pan-India.

Practice

Commercial Litigation Arbitration All 14 Practice Areas

Locations

Noida All Locations

Firm

Team Legal Updates Legal News Blog Contact