S&S
S & S Co.
Advocates & Solicitors
Bar Council of India — Notice

Important Disclaimer & Notice

As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, advocates are not permitted to solicit work or advertise in any manner. By proceeding, you acknowledge that you are seeking information relating to S & S Co. of your own accord and that there has been no solicitation, advertisement or inducement by S & S Co. or any of its members.

The content of this website is provided solely for informational purposes and should not be construed as legal advice. S & S Co. shall not be liable for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on material provided herein.

Any information shared through this website does not create an attorney-client relationship. Transmission of information herein is not intended to constitute, nor does receipt thereof constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

The contents of this website are the intellectual property of S & S Co. No part constitutes legal advice. Readers are requested to seek formal legal counsel before acting upon any information contained herein.
About Practice Areas Locations Legal Updates Legal News Team Blog Contact Us
Intellectual Property · 28 July 2026

A Trademark's Filing Date Beats 17 Years of Commercial Use by a Rival: Delhi High Court Rules for '20-20' Biscuit Registrant

Source: Originally reported by LiveLawBiz, RawLaw, Legal Service India and BananaIP on and around 28 July 2026, covering the Delhi High Court's ruling in Parle Products Pvt. Ltd. v. The Registrar of Trade Marks & Anr. This article has been independently researched and rewritten in full by S&S Co. Advocates & Solicitors for informational purposes — it is not a reproduction of the original reports. Readers are encouraged to consult the original sources and the underlying judgment directly.

A Division Bench of Justices V. Kameswar Rao and Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora has dismissed Parle's Letters Patent Appeal and affirmed registration of the '20-20' biscuit trademark in favour of Avon Agro, whose 'proposed to be used' application — filed 27 September 2007 — predated Parle's own application by just one week, even though Avon Agro never actually used the mark for 17 years while Parle built pan-India goodwill through continuous sales of its own '20-20' biscuits since 2007-08.

The Court held that trademark priority under Section 18 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 is governed strictly by the application filing date, and cannot be defeated by a rival's later commercial use — even extensive, long-running use that has built genuine market goodwill in the intervening years.

The ruling is a stark reminder to brand owners that market goodwill or prior commercial use will not by itself trump a rival's earlier-filed application, however dormant that earlier filing remained: the discipline has to run the other way, with businesses actively auditing the register and opposing conflicting applications promptly, rather than relying on established use as a fallback defence years later.

Get In Touch

Have a Question About
Intellectual Property?

Tell us about your situation — we'll help you figure out the right next step.

Contact S&S Co. →

A full-service law firm headquartered in Noida, Delhi and Kolkata — commercial litigation, arbitration, corporate advisory and regulatory counsel across Delhi NCR, Kolkata and pan-India.

Practice

Commercial Litigation Arbitration All 14 Practice Areas

Locations

Noida All Locations

Firm

Team Legal Updates Legal News Blog Contact