S&S
S & S Co.
Advocates & Solicitors
Bar Council of India — Notice

Important Disclaimer & Notice

As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, advocates are not permitted to solicit work or advertise in any manner. By proceeding, you acknowledge that you are seeking information relating to S & S Co. of your own accord and that there has been no solicitation, advertisement or inducement by S & S Co. or any of its members.

The content of this website is provided solely for informational purposes and should not be construed as legal advice. S & S Co. shall not be liable for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on material provided herein.

Any information shared through this website does not create an attorney-client relationship. Transmission of information herein is not intended to constitute, nor does receipt thereof constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

The contents of this website are the intellectual property of S & S Co. No part constitutes legal advice. Readers are requested to seek formal legal counsel before acting upon any information contained herein.
About Practice Areas Locations Legal Updates Legal News Team Blog Contact Us
Infrastructure & PPP · 10 September 2026

Delhi High Court Constitutes a Substitute Arbitral Tribunal for the Bangalore-Chennai Expressway Dispute, Bypassing the Contract's SAROD Clause

Source: Originally reported by LiveLaw Biz, The Print and ION Analytics on and around 10 September 2026, covering the Delhi High Court's ruling in D.P. Jain Bangalore Chennai Expressways Pvt. Ltd. v. National Highways Authority of India (Delhi High Court). This article has been independently researched and rewritten in full by S&S Co. Advocates & Solicitors for informational purposes — it is not a reproduction of the original reports. Readers are encouraged to consult the original sources and the underlying judgment directly.

Under a Concession Agreement dated 4 February 2022 for a section of the Bangalore-Chennai Expressway, a Division Bench had on 20 August 2026 partly allowed D.P. Jain's appeal, declaring the project eligible for free fly ash with transportation and referring its monetary claim — including Rs. 180.16 crore — to the Dispute Resolution Board or Arbitral Tribunal for quantification.

After NHAI declined to implement that ruling and terminated the Concession Agreement on 1 September 2026, Justice Sachin Datta of the Delhi High Court, on 10 September 2026, constituted a three-member Arbitral Tribunal after both parties agreed to depart from the SAROD arbitration procedure that their agreement had prescribed, allowing the dispute to move forward without further delay over the appointment mechanism.

Concessionaires facing an authority's non-implementation of a favourable court ruling, followed by termination of the concession, can secure a substitute tribunal by consent even where the underlying contract mandates a specific institutional arbitration mechanism like SAROD.

Get In Touch

Have a Question About
Infrastructure & PPP?

Tell us about your situation — we'll help you figure out the right next step.

Contact S&S Co. →

A full-service law firm headquartered in Noida, Delhi and Kolkata — commercial litigation, arbitration, corporate advisory and regulatory counsel across Delhi NCR, Kolkata and pan-India.

Practice

Commercial Litigation Arbitration All 14 Practice Areas

Locations

Noida All Locations

Firm

Team Legal Updates Legal News Blog Contact